A DEFENSORIA PÚBLICA DA UNIÃO E O INCIDENTE DE DESLOCAMENTO DE COMPETÊNCIA: Razões jurídicas e fático-institucionais da impossibilidade e impropriedade da atribuição de legitimidade à luz da jurisprudência da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos sobre direito de defesa e defesa técnica eficiente

Abstract

The research aims to analyze, in the light of the standards set by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on technical defense, the reasons for the legal impossibility and the factual institutional inadequacy of the potential legitimacy of the Federal Public Defender's Office to file the Incident of Displacement of Jurisdiction (IDC). It focuses on the minimum parameters set by the Court for the technical defense to be considered ineffective and the particularities of the IDC, comparing these elements with the institutional functions of the Public Defender's Office, in order to assess how the use of the institute by the institution is legally impossible and factually-institutionally inadequate. Thus, applying the hypothetical-deductive method, through documentary, jurisprudential and bibliographical research, with a qualitative-quantitative approach, the aim is to demonstrate how the possible action of the Federal Public Defender's Office as proposer of an Incident of Displacement of Jurisdiction is not compatible with the inter-American standards regarding technical defense, with the institutional functions conferred on it by the internal order and with the current structure of the institution.